Cite this article as:
Aksenova O. V. Field Dialectics: Actor`s Contradictions in Russian Development. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Sociology. Politology, 2019, vol. 19, iss. 4, pp. 392-398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1818-9601-2019-19-4-392-398
Field Dialectics: Actor`s Contradictions in Russian Development
The paper is dedicated to the problem of theoretical approachesin empirical sociological studies of social development. Thelimitations of modern theories related to the insufficient potentialof explanatory irrelevance of their concepts to Russian realityare considered. The paper reveals the reasons of dialectic logictheoretical instruments` usage. They are related to the impossibilityof the revealed paradoxes` explanation within modern theoreticalapproaches. One of these paradoxes is concerned with the activityof Russian and Soviet systems of management and governance.The other one is related to the formalization and algorythmizationof social interactions and functioning of a social action in Western civil society. The implementation of dialectic logic for the study ofdevelopment processеs and revealing the contradictions of socialaction and its subject in these processes are shown. The possibilitiesof dialectics in combination with polyparadigmal approach requiringcritical analysis of the theories and revealing the correlationswith the historical context in which these theories emerged arepresented. The conclusion is made on the effectiveness of dialecticlogic instruments` usage for studying various versions of progress,including Russian development ones which historically took place inthe situation of limited market.
- Вебер А. Б. Понять Маркса. К 200летию со днярождения К. Маркса // Свободная мысль. 2018. № 2.С. 172–185.
- Норт Д. К. Институты, институциональные изменения и функционирование экономики (Institutions,Institutional Change and Economic Performance (1990)).М. : Фонд экономической книги «Начала», 1997.
- Jenkins C. Resource mobilization theory and thestudy of social movements // Annual Review of Sociology.1983. Vol. 9. P. 527–553
- Tilly Ch. From mobilization torevolution. Englewood Cliffs, 1978.
- Touraine A. An Introduction to the Study of SocialMovements // Social Research. 1985. Vol. 52, № 4.P. 749–785.
- Ядов В. А. Возможность совмещения теоретическихподходов // Социологический журнал. 2003. № 3. С. 12.
- Качанов Ю. Л. Полипарадигмальный подход, логика исоциологические понятия // Социс. 2010. № 8. С. 16.
- Коллинз Р. Социология : наука или антинаука? // THESIS.1994. Вып. 4. С. 89–90.
- Mol A. P. J. The Refinement of Production. Ecologicalmodernization theory and the chemical industry. Utrecht :Van Arkel, 1995.
- Mol A. P. J., Spaargaren G., Buttel F. H. GoverningEnvironmental Flows : Global Challenges to Social Theory.Cambridge, MA : MIT Press, 2006.
- Latour B. Reassembling the social An Introduction toActorNetworkTheory. Oxford : Oxford University Press,2005.
- He G. Z., Boas I. J. C., Mol A. P. J., Lu Y. L. Whatdrives public acceptance of chemical industrial parkpolicy in China? // Resources, Conservation & Recycling.2018. Vol. 138. P. 1–12 ; Zhang L., Xu Y., Oosterveer P.,Mol A. P. J. Consumer trust in different food provisioning schemes : evidence from Beijing, China // Journal ofCleaner Production. 2016. Vol. 134. P. 269–279.
- Аксенова О. В. Генезис социальноэкологическойрефлексии на Западе во второй половине XX века //Социс. 2004. № 9. С. 68–76
- Аксенова О. В. Парадигма социального действия :профессионалы в российской модернизации. М. : ИСРАН, 2016. С. 21–54.Халий И. А. Современные общественные движения :инновационный потенциал российских преобразованийв традиционалистской среде. М. : ИС РАН, 2007. С. 11.
- Халий И. А. Современные общественные движения : инновационный потенциал ро ссийских преобразований в традиционалистской среде. М. : ИС РАН, 2007. С. 11.
