Cite this article as:
Gorbachev M. V. Post-Soviet Political Projects Before the new Civilizational Challenges. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Sociology. Politology, 2015, vol. 15, iss. 2, pp. 85-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1818-9601-2015-15-2-85-88
Post-Soviet Political Projects Before the new Civilizational Challenges
Political space that is conventionally called post-Soviet, unique in its essence and nature of the occurrence. A significant amount of vertical political ties, relations and echanisms, which were United States that were part of the USSR, was replaced by a horizontal form of political interactions. One of these forms have become diverse political projects, which was initiated by the leaders of post-Soviet republics, including the Russian political elite. Part of these political projects was associated with Pro-Western perspective of evelopment, other, raised the possibility of Eurasian integration, third, oriented towards the «Eastern vector» of growth. These diverse political projects had one thing in common: the choice of the integration model, which essentially meant more significant and profound in its content civilizational choice. This choice is particularly stood before modern Russia, as the largest country in the post-Soviet space. The article analyzes the problems of development of Russian political projects civilizational level. Investigates their etermining factors, identify their possible prospects.
1 Крят Д. Общее дело // Беларусь сегодня. 2011. 18 окт. С. 4, 6, 9.
2 Aron L. The Putin Doctrine // Foreign Affairs. 2013. March 8. P. 11-12.
3 Cheda R. Arabski wirus w Rosji // Wirtualna Polska. 2011. June 27. P. 7.
4 Бухвалов А. Евразийский проект Путина // Rilsoa. 2013. 5 июня. С. 5.
5 Россия в СМИ СНГ. URL: http://inosmi.ru/books/20050421/219061.html (дата обращения: 04.05.2015).
6 Editorial. Obscene assumption // Russian Germany. 2012. October 11. P. 9.
7 Коэн А. Перезагрузка была мертворожденной // День. 2013. 22 апр. С. 4-5.
8 Mauro De Bonis Urss? No grazie, Putin sogna l’Unione Euroasiatica // Limes. 2012. September 3. P. 12.
9 Mankoff J. What a Eurasian Union Means for Washington // The National Interest. 2012. April 19. P. 7, 9.
10 Zigfeld К. Ar problēmām NVS // American Thinker. 2012. April 2. P. 14.
11 Trenin D. The End of the EU-Russia Relationship As You Know It // Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. 2012. December 25. P. 6.
12 Боровский О. Запад есть Запад, а Россия есть Восток // Украiна Молода. 2013. 5 июня. С. 2-3.
13 Бжезинский З. Великая шахматная доска. М. : Международные отношения, 1998. C. 174–175.
14 Zilpimiani L. L’Unione Eurasiatica rappresenta la nuova sfida di Putin all’Occidente // L’Occidentale. 2012. April 23. P. 8.
15 Editorial. Without Imperial Russia will perish? // Liberation. 2007. March 28. P. 15.
16 Editorial. Fuer Russland geht es in Kiew nicht nur um Macht, sondern auch um die Seele // Die Welt. 2004. December 01. P. 17.
17 Мезенцев Д. Мы открыты диалогу // Рос. газ. 2013. Федер. вып. № 6181 (205). C. 3.
18 Slaski B. L’Europe risque de pâtir de la montée en puissance de l’Eurasie // Le Monde. 2012. June 16. P. 8.
19 Mankoff J. What a Eurasian Union Means for Washington // The National Interest. 2012. April 19. P. 4.
20 Обзор зарубежных СМИ, 17 мая 2010 года. URL: http://inosmi.ru/sngbaltia/20140925/223233485.html (дата обращения: 12.04.2015).
21 Palombo G. Russia : prossima superpotenza mondiale? // Giornalettismo. 2010. May 16. P. 9, 12.
22 Вилков А. А. «Мягкая сила» как элемент имиджевых технологий во внутренней и внешней политике // Изв. Сарат. ун-та. Нов. сер. Сер. Социология. Политология. 2014. Т. 14, вып. 2. С. 74.
